ConversationMatters
Home Meet Loren Articles Resources Seminars FAQs Self-Tests Bookstore Conversation Products


Free eZine Signup


Sign up for your
Free Better Conversations eZine to improve your conversation skills.


Your Email Address:


  HTML


Your e-mail address will not be sold, shared or traded, ever. It will be used only to send you this E-Zine.


 
© 2006-2010 Loren Ekroth

If you encounter problems with this website, please contact,
loren@conversationmatters.com




Site maintained by
Vegas Web Repair

 

Be Flexible and Creative When Conversing

Impro-versation: No Denying

ARTICLE TOOLS

Printer This PagePrint This Article
Email This ArticleE-Mail This Article
		  Impro-versation: No Denying   

 One of the main concerns of the conversationally-impaired  is how to continue a conversation once it's started. These folks  dread the possibility that a conversation will bog down and sink  into awkward silence. I am hereby proposing a nearly fail-safe  rule for these folks: “Don't deny what the other person says.”  That is, accept what the other person says as a contribution to  the conversation; then add to that.  In improvisational theater, the above “Don't deny” rule is  known as “Yes, and.” Your fellow player makes an offer  (that is, says or does something), and you add to it. Simple?  Yes. Easy? Not always. However, when players stick to this  rule, the improvised conversation emerges, grows nicely, and the  story-line develops. Audiences are engaged and amused by the  rapid flow of discourse and the surprising things that are said.   

Example of breaking the “Yes, and” rule:   

Player A: “Hey, Bob! Nice yellow shoes you're wearing.”  Player B: “You must be color-blind. These shoes are black.”   

In the above example, player B interrupts the conversational flow  by blocking the first player's offer through denial.   

Example of following the “Yes, and” rule:   

Player A: “Hey, Bob! Nice yellow shoes you're wearing.” 
Player B: “Yes, and I got them on sale at half-price.” 

In the second example, player B accepts the offer and adds to it,  thereby continuing the flow. Although improv players don't always  say “Yes, and,” the experienced ones always think “Yes, and” because  they understand that by accepting and adding to an offer, the story  develops spontaneously.   

A brief exercise that demonstrates the power of “but” to frustrate  and defeat a group is this: Give a group of 5-6 people a simple  assignment such as “Plan a group picnic in 10 minutes.” Then give  the instruction that each contribution after the opening comment  must be preceded by “Yes, but.” For example:   

A: I suggest we picnic at the City Park 
B: Yes, but it's often crowded there. 
C: Well, we could go to the seashore. 
D: Yes, but the tides are dangerous. 
E: How about going to a movie instead? 
F: Yes, but we probably can't get tickets to a good one. 

You get the idea. Although this “Yes, but” pattern is  exaggerated, it parallels what often happens between people.  The “but-ing” blocks and does not allow the conversation to  develop. In the mixed message, the “but” erases the “yes.”   

To say “Yes, and” does not require you to agree with a  comment, only that you acknowledge what was said, and you  thereby create a positive climate. The “and” commits you to  offering an addition rather than a substitution.   

Linguist and author Deborah Tannen refers to our society as  “a culture of critique” in her popular book, The Argument Culture:  Stopping America's War of Words. As she illustrates, the  media are often formatted in a “Yes, but” structure, political right  against left, girlfriend vs. boyfriend, plaintiff vs. defendant. This  is the stuff of talk-shows, court-shows, sport shows, and outrageous  Jerry Springer type shows. Conflict and argument, the producers  agree, pay off. Apparently, listeners and viewers are attracted to  such conflict and, as mogul Lee Shubert once said of attendance in his  theaters, “The box office never lies.”   

Although it may be true that “conflict sells” in the media, it is  clearly not true that conflict works well in ordinary conversation.  Denying, deflecting, ignoring, and all the other ways one can block  the contributions of others impede the conversation and almost  always manage to shut it down. The negatives are substantial  Among them:   

--You'll probably distance the relationship 
--You'll learn nothing new 
--You'll create awkward moments 
--You'll set up a pattern of opposition rather than collaboration 
--Eventually you yourself won't be acknowledged either 

However, when you think of others' comments as “offers”  instead of “challenges,” and your own remarks as “additional offers,”  the conversation flows easily. As a small experiment, eliminate  any of your “Yes, but” responses from a few conversations and  see what happens. You'll immediately notice the change.  


		

Loren Ekroth ©2010, All rights reserved.

Loren Ekroth, Ph.D. is a specialist in human communication and a national expert on conversation for business and social life. His articles and programs strengthen critical communication skills for business and professional people.

Contact at Loren@conversationmatters.com
Check resources and archived articles at www.conversationmatters.com.